The fact that there isn't a popular 3rd-party repo packaging Chromium does not appear to be relevant to Fedora. I don't see anybody discouraging it. Perhaps you should approach a popular 3rd-party to suggestion packaging Chromium in their repos?
http://rpmfusion.org/ is one such standard 3rd-party repo for Fedora users. Perhaps you can contribute packaging for Chromium to their project?
http://rpmfusion.org/ is one such standard 3rd-party repo for Fedora users. Perhaps you can contribute packaging for Chromium to their project?
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 11:33 AM, john.tiger <john.tigernassau@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I understand Fedora's position on Chromium BUT not having a 3rd party available for F21 is not acceptable -
ie. this morning Firefox is not connecting to the internet (yet thunderbird, dnf, etc is ... - I'm seeing a kernel problem warning
WARNING: CPU 0 PID 1419 at drivers.net.wireless/ath/ath9k.recv
point is, browser choice is important and Chromium on my F20 is working.
Also as developers, we need to work with all browsers.
Even if Fedora does not elect to maintain packages for Chromium, there should be some effort to work with or encourage a 3rd party or fix whatever package might be holding up someone else from implementing it (ie if it's clang compiling or whatever.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
