Re: Packaging ghostscript's X11 support separately

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2014-12-18 20:20 GMT+03:00 Tim Waugh <twaugh@xxxxxxxxxx>:

> I could package it in its own sub-package, ghostscript-x11, but that
> might be a bit surprising to people who expect 'ghostscript' to have an
> x11alpha driver.
>
> Alternatively I could move everything else from ghostscript to a new
> sub-package ghostscript-base, and have 'ghostscript' (i.e. just the
> X11.so plugin) require ghostscript-base (i.e. everything else).

The latter approach (ghostscript depending on *-core and *-x11/gui) is
better. it won't break any installations while providing enough
flexibility for the new ones.

-- 
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux