On 15 December 2014 at 13:09, Hedayat Vatankhah <hedayat.fwd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 1. If PK really needs its own *copy* of the cache, that's OK (well, not OK > but acceptable), but IMHO it should not download it independently too. But yum/dnf only download the files it needs for the single operation, and not all the "matching" files, unless you're using "dnf makecache" or something like that. > preferably using hardlinks if possible Yes, hardlinks help for the space-on-disk problem. > 2. I believe that the use should know, and more importantly be able to > control WHEN the repo data is being updated. At the very least, he should be > able to specify if the updates are automatic or not using a very user > friendly method (probably during/after the installation; or per network > connection). At the moment the PK front-ends only download when on wifi or wired. Do you have an actual use-case for per-network configuration? > 3. I think the repository data management backend should be separate from > the frontends (including PK, and dnf cli). PK isn't a front-end, gnome-packagekit and gnome-software are. PK is just the mechanism. Richard. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
