|
I have a fairly standard FC20 setup which I started upgrading by fedup --network 21 --product=workstation There were 109 packages for which there was no upgrade; 62 are *-debuginfo, 12 are from various oddball repos (adobe, simulavr, etc), but 36 are I believe regular Fedora Core 20 packages, including fairly important ones like 8 related to the R language. Two of those result in packaging conflicts and fedup warns about 'upgrade at your own risk': icedtea-web-1.5.2-0.fc20.x86_64 requires java-1.7.0-openjdk-1:1.7.0.71-2.5.3.0.fc20.x86_64 R-core-3.1.2-1.fc20.x86_64 requires tk-1:8.5.14-1.fc20.x86_64, tcl-1:8.5.14-1.fc20.x86_64, libicu-50.1.2-10.fc20.x86_64 I imagine there will be fc21 packages for those eventually, so should I file a bugzilla report on it, or go ahead with the install and wait for the new versions? If reporting, would it be against fedup or specific packages? yum list icedtea-web R-core java-1.7.0-openjdk tk tcl libicu returns: Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, langpacks, refresh-packagekit Installed Packages R-core.x86_64 3.1.2-1.fc20 @updates icedtea-web.x86_64 1.5.2-0.fc20 @updates java-1.7.0-openjdk.x86_64 1:1.7.0.71-2.5.3.0.fc20 @updates libicu.i686 50.1.2-10.fc20 installed libicu.x86_64 50.1.2-10.fc20 installed tcl.x86_64 1:8.5.14-1.fc20 installed tk.x86_64 1:8.5.14-1.fc20 installed |
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
