On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 04:59:54AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > That is not part of the "tick-tock" proposal. > > That is part of the "polish" release proposal. > I don't care how you call it. The fact remains that doing a release without > taking in new upstream releases is a complete no-go from the standpoint of > desktop environment maintainers. It also goes against the Fedora "First" > principle, as already stated by others. Well, it kind of matters, if you're going to throw around lines like "this 'tick-tock' proposal is a complete no-go" when you actually are talking about something I went out of my way to explain was _different_ from the tick-tock idea. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
