Am 04.12.2014 um 16:48 schrieb drago01:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:+1 for the proposal in general from me because i am one of them suggesting for years that every second release should have the focus on bugfixes / polish / get large features from the previous release mature keep in mind that this *finally* could even lead to faster development because annoying bugs people struggle with and can't be fixed that quick in the current cycles may go awayWell forbidding features for 6 months wont get people to start fixing bugs they will work on those features anyway (just only upstream)
even it that case it means new and rough features become mature before included in a GA release
That only works if you have paid developers that you have control over. If you have volunteers ... it won't work. It would be pretty much just mean "skip every second release" because that "bug fixing" wouldn't be any different from what you get from updates
not really - if that would be true any Fedora policy would be ignored most of the time because "i am a volunteer and do what i want"
don't talk about *the developers* prematurei guess there are enough stressed all the time because they have plenty work on their to-do list and need to spend integration and testing work caused by other large features (not their own ones)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
