On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 18:40:02 +0100,
Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Am 18.11.2014 um 18:29 schrieb Bruno Wolff III:
Mozilla is a third party. There is no reason that they should be
contacted by default.
calling upstream "3rd party" is somehow strange
most code in fedora is from 3rd party
I am first party. Fedora is second party. I deal directly with Fedora.
Mozilla is a third party. I don't deal with them.
if you don't trust the 3rd party you *really* need to review every
single line of code
I expect Fedora to protect my interests, so I don't have to do code reviews.
Clearly there are limits to that, but I except some risk in order to save
time and money.
*but* please avoid FUD and paranoia and claim upstream unstrustable
until you can prove that instead of assume it
I made no such claim. What I don't want to have to do is to have to trust
them to be responsible about data they have no need for in the first place.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
