Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F21 tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Kalev Lember <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F21 tree
From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:19:19 -0600
Cc: leiningen-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdisco-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dragonegg-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gedit-valencia-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, totpcgi-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gdesklet-SlideShow-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, django-recaptcha-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, fatrat-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rubygem-ruby-debug-base19-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, python-coffin-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pootle-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, flush-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, transifex-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ltsp-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, libopensync-plugin-irmc-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ocaml-pa-do-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gdesklets-citation-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gofer-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, juffed-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rubygem-linecache19-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, meshmagick-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, openvas-client-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, edelib-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, why-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sugar-tamtam-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, openslides-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, audtty-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rubygem-rubigen-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, libghemical-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, authhub-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gorm-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, python-django-addons-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, deltacloud-core-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, python-askbot-fedmsg-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, monodevelop-vala-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, zyGrib-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, python-django-longerusername-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, valabind-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, nwchem-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <5464B003.2010800@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 15:20:03 +0200,
 Kalev Lember <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

meshmagick

For meshmagick the real isssue is FTBFS due to stricter checking by gcc.I started working on it a while back but didn't finish and didn't get backto it. I believe I can get it fixed by Monday.

--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- F-21 Branched report: 20141113 changes
  - From: Fedora Branched Report
- Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F21 tree
  - From: Kalev Lember

Prev by Date: Re: Suspend/resume broken on Lenovo laptops (Fedora 21 beta)
Next by Date: Re: Attempting to contact unresponsive maintainer - jomara
Previous by thread: Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F21 tree
Next by thread: Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F21 tree
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]