Re: Re: Re: python distutils on Fedora 20

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I suspect there is a problem with the install of gcc-c++.

I tried to remove and reinstall gcc-c++ and got errors. When I do a
    yum check
I get the following message:

1:NetworkManager-0.9.9.0-41.git20131003.fc20.x86_64 is a duplicate with 1:NetworkManager-0.9.9.0-39.git20131003.fc20.x86_64 1:NetworkManager-glib-0.9.9.0-41.git20131003.fc20.x86_64 is a duplicate with 1:NetworkManager-glib-0.9.9.0-39.git20131003.fc20.x86_64 audit-libs-2.3.7-1.fc20.x86_64 is a duplicate with audit-libs-2.3.6-1.fc20.x86_64 1:autocorr-en-4.2.5.2-5.fc20.noarch is a duplicate with 1:autocorr-en-4.2.5.2-1.fc20.noarch
blas-3.4.2-7.fc20.x86_64 is a duplicate with blas-3.4.2-3.fc20.x86_64
blas-devel-3.4.2-7.fc20.x86_64 is a duplicate with blas-devel-3.4.2-3.fc20.x86_64
cpp-4.8.3-1.fc20.x86_64 is a duplicate with cpp-4.8.2-7.fc20.x86_64
createrepo_c-libs-0.4.1-1.fc20.x86_64 is a duplicate with createrepo_c-libs-0.4.0-1.fc20.x86_64

...

How does one fix these type of errors ?

On 10/28/2014 5:43 AM, Brad Bell wrote:
Thanks Alec:
I was using the executable g++ which was installed by the gcc-c++ package, so the gcc-c++ package was installed on the Fedora 20 system.

Your comment about locate cc1plus was a big help. If I add
    /usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.8.2
to my execution path, then the setup.py command works on Fedora 20 . If not, it fails

The strange thing is that cc1plus is not in the execution path on the Fedora 19 system (where the setup script works) but it is on the system (if one checks locate).

I think this is a bug in the Fedora 20 distribution of distutils. Do you agree ?

On 10/26/2014 5:51 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 2014-10-26 13:35, Brad Bell wrote:
I have a python setup.py script that works on Fedora 19 and not Fedora 20. I have tried posting a question about it to python-devel; see https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/python-devel/2014-October/000639.html
but have not gotten any response.

Would someone please direct me to the proper mailing list or is a bug report more appropriate ?
Hm...

]$ cat /etc/fedora-release
Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug)

$ locate cc1plus
/usr/libexec/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/4.8.2/cc1plus

$ rpm -qf /usr/libexec/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/4.8.2/cc1plus
gcc-c++-4.8.2-7.fc20.i686

$ repoquery -q --whatprovides g++
[nothing returned]

$ repoquery -q --whatprovides gcc-c++
gcc-c++-0:4.8.3-7.fc20.i686

i. e., shouldn't you require gcc-c++ instead of g++?

Cheers!

--alec






--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux