On Fri, 2014-11-07 at 08:52 +0000, Richard Hughes wrote: > No? We push unstable GNOME to rawhide all the time; or is this more of > a case where we're worrying that a stable gthumb won't be available > before F22 is due? Exactly; since that's what happened for F21, there's a reasonable chance it will happen in the future as well, if not for F22 (which seems quite possible), maybe F23. With most of GNOME, we know when the next stable release will be, and there's no harm in pushing unstable versions so that they get testing. That's not the case with gthumb. I'm confused why they're not following the GNOME release cycle, but that's their choice, and the reasonable consequence is that they get less testing in rawhide so we don't have to gamble on whether or not we'll need to do a downgrade and +epoch or choose to leave it unstable. (In this case, the revert is clearly the correct choice as upstream has said we should not ship 3.3. Anyway, this vindicates the WG's choice to stick with Shotwell for the time being, as gthumb 3.2 really is a huge downgrade....)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
