On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> That's only going to work if llvm34 renames all of its binaries, and ghc >> is changed to invoke the renamed ones, right? Otherwise the 3.4 and 3.5 >> versions of /usr/bin/llc will conflict. > > Hmm yes I guess I should go the whole way... > > My initial lazy plan was just that ghc-compiler.armv7hl > should require and BR llvm34 instead of llvm (and make llvm34 > Conflicts with llvm and llvm34-devel conflicts with llvm-devel...). > > Not sure how many people really need both (on arm), > but I suppose it is better to avoid conflict where possible. Well mesa depends on llvm so that sounds like not really practical. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
