Re: downgrade version of gthumb in fedora 21 final?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 13:13 -0800, James Patterson wrote:
>>
>> Is it too late to downgrade gthumb in Fedora 21 to 3.2.x?
>>
>> The version in Fedora is really slow. I posted a bug with more info:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161052
>
> I agree that should be downgraded in F21 and possibly in rawhide as
> well. Since gthumb does not follow the GNOME release schedule, we
> shouldn't push unstable versions of gthumb to rawhide. I suspect it's
> being picked up by mclazy....

I fully agree. I'll double-check, that the problem is caused by the
unstable version of gthumb (and not some other updated library in
F21). I guess it was updated in the hope that the next stable version
will be released before F21. If appropriate, I'll downgrade gthumb.

Best regards,
Christian
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux