On 6 November 2014 19:25, Alexander Ploumistos <alex.ploumistos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So, should we contact upstream about the appdata file requirement and if > that doesn't work out make our own and send it to the package maintainer? > Where should the screenshots go? You can either put them on your fedorapeople page, or just push them to fedora-appstream in the extra-screenshots section. > I think that the > upstream bug filing requirement for such inactive projects is just a waste > of time and should be forgone. I think you'd be surprised; a few of the "long dead" projects I filed bugs for have actually shipped a new tarball with appdata in... > Just wondering out loud here, but how come gnome chemistry utils not have an > appdata already? It looks like they were added in 0.14.9 according to http://www.nongnu.org/gchemutils/release_info.html -- I'll find out what's going wrong in the Fedora package. Thanks for the thinking out loud :) Richard. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
