On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:49:27PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 21:37 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:27:58PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > Testers, please take care to test the update thoroughly, despite the > > > > > small bump and small description it is a major change to the package. > > > > > > > That I can agree with. I'd much prefer a concrete list of things to > > > > test in this update though, which would be *useful* and lead to a > > > > better release. Right now you suggest that anything might be broken. > > > > > > Well, I just said it's a big change and the update description doesn't > > > accurately encapsulate it. > > > > > > I would of course be very happy with a concrete list of things to test > > > in the update. The update description would be a good place for it. > > > Well, then ping me on IRC to update the description (or even mail it > > to test@ or whatever) and with luck 30 minutes later we would have a > > much better picture than by looking at a squashed diff. > > Well, that's more or less what my initial mail was meant to be. I didn't > post the diff initially, only in response to a follow-up mail asking > what the difference between the builds was. The first mail I saw was this: """I wanted to flag up that, in fact, systemd-216-9 is a major change from systemd-216-8 and is not really systemd 216 at all. ... worked out at >7,000 lines worth of additions and removals between the underlying code of 'systemd-216-8' and 'systemd-216-9'. """ Zbyszek -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
