On Mon, 03 Nov 2014 17:22:27 +0100 Honza Horak <hhorak@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/28/2014 08:08 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > Note that any or all of the above may be appropriate, depending on > > the exact nature of the specific tests. > > > > For example, there are already some public Beaker installer tests at > > https://bitbucket.org/fedoraqa/fedora-beaker-tests for execution on > > http://beaker.fedoraproject.org/ > > I didn't know about this instance, interesting. It's currently a dev instance (read: not backed up, best-effort level of support) mostly due to some issues in the instance. The beaker devs are aware of the issue and hopefully there will be a fix before too long. Once that fix is released, we still need to make a full production system and that'll take some doing - not impossible but not really trivial. We're trying to get that all figured out but as a short summary: a working, production beaker instance for fedora will take a bit of time once beaker is fully compatible with how things are set up in infra. How long depends on overall priority and if a couple details work out the way we hope. I'm happy to go into more details but will skip them for the sake of brevity on a large distribution cross-posted thread. > Can anybody shortly explain the plan with this instance, if there is > any? It would make sense to me to use Taskotron to run Beaker tests > at http://beaker.fedoraproject.org, but maybe there are some other > plans? That's pretty much what we have in mind, yeah. Tim
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
