On 2014-10-30, 14:04 GMT, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> said: >> I am pretty sure, that this was already discussed many times, but I >> proposed to drop the seemingly last dependency of RPM on Perl in this >> [1] ticket and hence Perl from minimal buildroot (unless it will be >> pulled in by some other packages). The RPM maintainers as well as Perl >> maintainers seems to be in favor of this change. > > One other thing to check for is spec files that use perl (maybe when the > resulting package does not). I know I've written spec files that use > perl to fix things and what not. Sure, it should be checked, but not that it would free those packages from being broken. Let me quote https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines Note: If you call perl or python in your spec file (and it is not already a BuildRequires for the package), you need to explicitly add a BuildRequires for perl or python. Moreover, perl is not (and I believe it never was) in the list in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Exceptions_2 Matěj -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
