On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 01:15:14PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 10/23/2014 10:57 PM, Ralph Bean wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 01:16:29PM -0700, Ed Marshall wrote: > >> Is it API-compatible? > > > > Not exactly https://github.com/kennethreitz/requests/blob/master/HISTORY.rst#230-2014-05-16 > > I would personally say no to updating libraries to incompatible > versions. We already have way too much churn in F20; doing the update > would mean updating and retesting anything that uses python-requests. > And not just testing the packages in Fedora, this could also potentially > break 3rd party programs that people might have written in house. > > Maybe just tell the users who were asking for an update to switch to > F21? It's really close now and I know several people who are using it > daily on their main workstations and are very happy with it. I'm convinced and will let it sit as is. Thanks for writing back.
Attachment:
pgpYvwrYIykG1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
