On Friday, October 24, 2014 10:07:09 AM Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > Has Fedora considered supporting U2F for its infrastructure. IMO it's > *much* nicer than standard Yubikeys. > > On a related note, I will gladly swap a review for libu2f-host: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826 > > --Andy This is just my two cents, and I have nothing to do with Fedora infrastructure, but given that u2f is only supported via chrome/chromium for right now I would venture a guess that it probably isn't the right solution. When it gets baked into Firefox etc. I would say that would be a much better time for it. -Erinn
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
