Re: dnf vs yum

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri 24 Oct 2014 05:35:00 PM CEST Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 04:56:20PM +0200, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>> Thought we should really switch to actually use dnf api instead. Things
>> get complicated for us when we want to support EL6 then...Maybe we should
>> just drop EPEL6 support.
>
> "Drop" as in "use yum for that, but dnf for the new versions"? That
> sounds reasonable.

Well reality is f-r is mostly for checking *current* Fedora
guidelines that in some cases apply only to rawhide. If someone is
running f-r on a system from 4 years ago to verify current packaging
guidelines I'd question their knowledge of the guidelines :-)

It's not impossible to do...I just wonder about cost/value proposition
of keeping the support and spending even more time on it.

--
Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx>
Business System Analyst, Hosted and Shared Services

PGP: 7B087241
Red Hat Inc.                               http://cz.redhat.com
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux