2014-10-21 16:39 GMT+02:00 Máirín Duffy <duffy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > On 10/21/2014 09:36 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: >> >> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 08:28:16AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >>> >>> A few specific comments that have been made on the Board ticket (to >>> avoid rehashing them). >>> >>> * "Fedora Server 21" sounds like we've had 21 releases of Fedora Server >>> and we certainly haven't. >>> * Should we start all of the Products at version 1 and say "built on the >>> Fedora 21 platform"? >> >> >> My opinion is that since we've decided on a unified lifecycle and >> release process for now, we should reflect that in the names, so: >> >> Fedora 21 Cloud >> Fedora 21 Server >> Fedora 21 Workstation >> >> but that we should also allow unversioned naming: >> >> Fedora Cloud >> Fedora Server >> Fedora Workstation >> >> In the future, if we have separated release cycles, I think separate >> numbering might make sense, with the "Built on the Fedora 21 platform" >> wording or similar. Possibily date-based schemes for the products — >> but I don't want to get the cart too far ahead of the horse on that. > > > ^^^ This > > From my POV (the designer / branding person,) this is exactly the plan I > support. > Amen This is a fair compromise between having a consistent numbering and a strong product branding. H. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
