On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 08:47 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote: > > On 10/21/2014 08:42 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 10/21/2014 08:28 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > >>> * Should we start all of the Products at version 1 and say "built on the > >>> Fedora 21 platform"? > >> > >> Is there any intention to release the products on different schedules? > > > > Definitely not now or in the near future. > > Does any group want to eventually release on a different cycle than the > others? > > I mean I think this is the critical question. Because if the products > are always going to be in sync, having separate version numbers for > Fedora and each of them is going to confuse way more than it clarifies. I cannot speak for the entirety of the Server Working Group, but I've been advocating for Fedora Server to eventually move to a different major release cadence (doing minor releases aligned with the Fedora base though).[1] That being said, the Server WG agreed unanimously that this was not going to be a near-term goal. I suspect at that point we will end up having to re-brand Server in some way (possibly by re-starting the numbering at 1) [1] https://fedoraserver-wgblog.rhcloud.com/proposal-announcement-fedora-server-lifecycle-stable-and-development/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
