On Thursday, 16 October 2014 at 16:47, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 14:40 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We seem to have a number of broken dependencies in F21 that have gone > > unfixed for a quite some time. Not sure what's up with them; the > > maintainers are supposed to get daily notifications to make sure these > > don't go unnoticed. > > > > Does anyone have ideas how to deal with these packages? > > > > I wonder if it would make sense to just drop them before F21. Having > > broken dependencies basically means that the packages are completely > > broken and cannot be installed at all. Not much point in shipping those > > in the repositories ... > > > > Any ideas how to deal with this? > > Here's a quick look at some of them. > > Note that I'm not a provenpackager, so I can't actually do anything > about it myself. [...] > >> [cp2k] > >> cp2k-2.5.1-8.fc21.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) = 0:1.1.6-2.fc21 > >> cp2k-mpich-2.5.1-8.fc21.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) = 0:1.1.6-2.fc21 > >> cp2k-openmpi-2.5.1-8.fc21.armv7hl requires libmpi_usempi.so.1 > >> cp2k-openmpi-2.5.1-8.fc21.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) = 0:1.1.6-2.fc21 > > This hasn't finished building yet, but it seems ok so far: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7881650 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-12957/ in testing. Sorry, it took a while to get elpa building first and then fix the remaining issues in cp2k build. Regards, -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
