On 10/16/2014 09:32 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > <snip> > > There are no Django applications that are part of the install sets of > any of the Products or Spins so far as I am aware, so the risk to the > Project deliverable dates would be minimal. I'd suggest bringing it to > FESCo for a more complete risk-analysis, but I'd argue that we'd be > better off shipping python-django as 1.7 and also the python-django16 > package in Fedora 21. > +1 Shipping F21 with Django 1.6 as the default will *definitely* have us kicking ourselves in 6 months. And shipping 1.7 by default will make lots of Django users/devs happy. Definitely bring it up to FESCo, but it's probably riskier to be shipping something that will become unsupported within the release lifetime than to upgrade to the newer version. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
