On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 21:10:26 +0200 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 04:28:33AM -0400, Martin Krizek wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Vít Ondruch" <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 8:57:26 AM > > > Subject: Re: [Test-Announce] Taskotron Has Replaced AutoQA > > > > > > You have not mentioned URL of Taskotron here nor the Wiki is > > > updated to contain the link to the production version of > > > Taskotron. > > > > > > Vít > > > > https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/ > This says "Taskotron is in the very early stages of development with > the objective to replace AutoQA for automating selected QA tasks in > Fedora.", which doesn't seem to be true anymore. Thanks for pointing that out, I'll get it updated soon (today if my freeze break request is approved). > Also: > > """ > taskotron-dev.fedoraproject.org uses an invalid security certificate. > The certificate is not trusted because no issuer chain was provided. > The certificate is only valid for taskotron-dev01.qa.fedoraproject.org > """ That stems from two things: first is that the actual hostname of the machine responding to http requests doesn't match the public-facing hostname (this is true of almost all infra hosts). For the self-signed cert bit, as far as I know, most fedora app dev instances are using self-signed certs. It doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me to pay for a real SSL cert on a dev instance - especially when it would mean having individual certs on every dev instance (there's no central proxy for dev). Both stg and production are using proper SSL certs, though. Tim
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
