Am 12.10.2014 um 02:52 schrieb poma:
On 11.10.2014 23:19, Peter Robinson wrote:No, people make mistakes, the issue created wasn't intentional so there's no needs to have derogatory comments, your response to Matt isn't really appropriate either TBH.If it so benign as you write, your reactions are very intriguing. I wonder what is the true meaning of such
that you play around with a *development snapshot* and if you could expect 100% perfect it would be a GA? that a response like "What you trying to say, Fedora is driven by the bunch of amateurs!?" in case of a F22 rawhide while F21 short ago made it to alpha is a joke?
if you expect GA quality of packages and dependencies just use a GA release
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
