----- Original Message ----- > On 26 September 2014 12:36, Miloslav Trmač <mitr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This is $n-th gradual tightening of the rules > > Right, I think that's the only way to transition from having no rules > of inclusion, to a large cohesive set of high quality applications. > Dropping 95% of applications in the software center from F21 to F22 > would be a very difficult thing for a lot of people to swallow. Doing the same kind of work over and over is also difficult to swallow. I don’t know what the right answer is, I am just concerned. (Or, to put it in personal terms, I have two packages that are so marginally used that I am on the fence between updating them and orphaning them; they don’t have any appdata file yet, and seeing the pattern, it is always just too easy to rationalize that waiting for the next rule update will save me work.) > > Just ask for something like (1024x1024 bitmap or a SVG/PDF) by F22 Beta, > > to give us some future proofing, perhaps? > > SVG isn't a silver bullet. You need a very different source SVG for a > 16px icon to a 256px icon just due to the amount of detail that has to > be ommitted. The 256px icon doesn’t _have_ to have more detail to be sharp and look basically good (well, unless you decide to include complex real-world objects like a globe with all the continents), and do you expect to render them at 16px from the app data anywhere? > > (And I always thought that HiDPI is trying to keep the screen size of > > elements > > You can either sacrifice quality or size; padding a 32px icon to 128px > with a giant white border would keep the icon crisp and sharp, but > scaling it up *4 would make it the right size, but with awful quality. It would at least be no worse than having the same physical-size non-HiDPI screen; showing a tiny icon on HiDPI may well cause the HiDPi display to be _less_ usable. Blurry is “just” ugly (more of an aesthetics issue), tiny is unrecognizable (more of an getting-the-job-done issue). Mirek -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct