-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 19:18:23 +0100 Richard Hughes <hughsient@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi all, > > colord creates an extra-profiles subpackage that splits out some > extra, lesser user profiles. These are no-arch, but it appears that on > different architectures the results are very, very slightly different. > As we're dealing with 4Gb+ worth of floating point calculations, I'm > sure it's something subtle to do with precision of floating point on > different architectures. > > The failure is: > > FAILED: BuildError: mismatch when analyzing > colord-extra-profiles-1.2.3-2.fc21.noarch.rpm, rpmdiff output was: > added /usr/share/color/icc/colord/FOGRA27L_coated.icc > ... > > The build is here, if anyone can work it out: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7572550 > > Thanks for any ideas -- either to ignore the rpmdiff output, or just > if making the subpackage non-noarch is the right thing to do. > > Richard the issue is that on one arch, you would need to work out which you get extra files. BuildError: mismatch when analyzing colord-extra-profiles-1.2.3-2.fc21.noarch.rpm, rpmdiff output was: added /usr/share/color/icc/colord/FOGRA27L_coated.icc added /usr/share/color/icc/colord/FOGRA28L_webcoated.icc added /usr/share/color/icc/colord/FOGRA29L_uncoated.icc added /usr/share/color/icc/colord/FOGRA30L_uncoated_yellowish.icc added /usr/share/color/icc/colord/FOGRA40L_SC_paper.icc added /usr/share/color/icc/colord/FOGRA45L_lwc.icc added /usr/share/color/icc/colord/FOGRA47L_uncoated.icc added /usr/share/color/icc/colord/GRACoL_TR006_coated.icc added /usr/share/color/icc/colord/IFRA26S_2004_newsprint.icc added /usr/share/color/icc/colord/SNAP_TR002_newsprint.icc added /usr/share/color/icc/colord/SWOP_TR003_coated_3.icc added /usr/share/color/icc/colord/SWOP_TR005_coated_5.icc that means those files were added to one of the arches. so the filelists are different you will need to make sure all arches include the same files or make them archful. a quick look at the build.log files shows that i686 build is the only one they exist on. they do not exist on armv7hl or x86_64 Dennis Dennis -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUE2HDAAoJEH7ltONmPFDRrocP/1GqybpmTIG0DR3mql8WUppq acq/WYntSjjOEBKpWr2ocCBH8rgwX3dM29O4xbJ85m0UxYhtd6Jml5PMFKNPdcpP 21zWGBRv2In+kB9MirRexPh9Jja1Nn+cs4pIN54sFLUoRS6ewNJjLevukQPV4Urz +z16WGlW7jsmS84KZ/S5eLYEX/i9giH0Hi/5q6oR6iXaKtFAyN3Lnhtgi9hq8ONu BTQ+pp3fWqMyVf3NVwv5jWEEY54yXDlnC9X6jH/6hKM7waicAicGS2zs+HeKlQF2 qhniej4wCJsh0pIglAIne+9jsb0wJMXel7huvc5V0c9H2fb3N7+QktGcShXC7HSY uQe0rgT7B47WvWBCtqfiNflh3Se2xkxwu2lN5ScOs5LADsbrMjhcNADmJNUuKmdU pPzoWN/q/ihBoQhngSD7nbxF0N8ezl6YgSCBPONxjf6iBwtSV6LOqtE01OOCE0Hp i+Om8iubQ2ozXT091RwNyPmqaAICZXX3H4tzYuMGIy9jhxlS7GBzIbQNt83ze8Uu Y5bvT7GmBhgrRrdfExZvZSeILrF2iNl+T6rHu+Pe2Qvl05FoF5DjnsKpgPYsJGbn UrJdPe4HpQrDdJ0mjgfbZtw0vrCuB80OimV6X/EpOqk8DkDd2k5bn1YU8ohlCSWj FXEFMK41vXEbq2dU9KkM =7Lvo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
