-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 09/10/2014 07:53 AM, Tim Waugh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to have the default cups presets be: enable cups.socket
> enable cups.path disable cups.service
>
> In other words, I'd like cupsd to start when accessed locally via
> /var/run/cups/cups.socket, and when there are unprocessed files in
> the spool directory, but not otherwise.
>
> It looks like the packaging policy prevents that though. I'm trying
> to track down the rationale behind this part of the packaging
> policy:
>
> ==> 1.3.2 Socket activation Socket activation occurs when a service
> allows systemd to listen for connections to a specific socket and,
> when systemd receives a connection on that socket, it starts the
> service. To do this, the upstream source needs to have some minor
> coding work to let systemd listen for connections on the socket and
> there needs to be a .socket file in %{_lib}/systemd/system/ that
> tells systemd to listen to that socket and what to start when a
> connection is received. This is similar in function to inetd and
> some, but not all, services coded to work with inetd will work with
> socket activation. ***Simila to inetd, using socket activation for
> on-demand loading will impose a startup time penalty so we
> currently do not use this feature in Fedora.*** <== (my emphasis)
>
> It looks like this "Socket Activation" section was added on March
> 9th 2011. The only FPC meeting prior to that mentioning socket
> activation was on January 19th 2011:
>
> [...] 17:10:58 <abadger1999> All services (started by systemd,
> xinet.d, bus activated, etc) should not be turned on by the package
> unless they are granted an exception. The exceptions are listed on
> this page along with reasons that the exception was granted which
> may lead to more general rules in the future: [...]
>
> The cups.socket unit passes the listening socket to cupsd, and
> only starts one instance of cupsd, so I don't think the "start-up
> time penalty" reason applies to it.
>
> Should I apply for an exception of some sort, or does the socket
> activation policy need revisiting?
>
It's also worth noting that FESCo granted the WGs the rights to make
decisions like this, so I'd recommend asking the Workstation WG for
permission to add this to their systemd preset file. I suspect it will
be granted.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iEYEARECAAYFAlQQUqAACgkQeiVVYja6o6PH+QCfaeqpTW4OTbrwB6VleTfKaMxg
qn8AnRARXgxUgD6UcA+bNGPGyYMv0Udr
=TkEz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
