Quoting Christopher (2014-09-08 21:35:23) > It'd be great if the fedpkg tool could do some of this. For example, fedpkg > could create git repos locally, from a template and a few questions, for > new packages, which could be pushed somewhere for review (usually GitHub, > I'd imagine). It could even create the review bug automatically, as well as > assist in the review process for the reviewer (setting the correct flags). > > Once approved and the package is created in pkgdb, git could be adjusted > automatically from a clone of this original repo created by the fedpkg tool. > > This puts some burden on the reviewer to review not only the package, but > also the use of the packaging process: ensure that the user created the git > repo correctly. But, that might not be a bad thing. I was struck by how > "manual" the new package process was, and how "automated" everything is > later. It's a big gap that could be closed with more tools on the "prepare > for review" side of things. I think this is excellent idea. (Mocked something already in response to Pierre) On the other hand, I think that webui process should be kept (just for sake of people who don't prefer CLI tools). Tomas -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct