On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi > > > On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:22 AM, drago01 wrote: >> >> Huh? What makes one legally not eligible to contribute? Just not >> signing the fpca? How is that different from someone that submits a >> patch via bugzilla / mail / whatever? >> I don't think people check whether those patch submitters have signed >> the fpca and neither do I think they should. > > > This is a problem that I have with the FPCA and I have highlighted it the > advisory board list before and no action was taken. Fedora project members > are enforcing it in places where it would be perfectly acceptable to take a > patch under an open source license without enforcing the FPCA requirement > unnecessarily. There is no legal basis for that. Well the FPCA seem to talk about this if someone that didn't sign it sent you a patch all he/she has to do is to provide it under an "acceptable license". -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
