On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 12:05:52PM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > On 09/04/2014 05:38 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > >On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 11:35:43AM +0200, Johannes Lips wrote: > >>wouldn't it make sense to integrate a check into the processes, when people leave Redhat, that the packages in fedora are properly orphaned or get a new owner? > > Why would even someone's employment status matter? Fedora is a community project. > When they leave RedHat they presumably will no longer have @redhat.com > addresses, so at least that has to be taken care of. RedHat presumably has > an exit process and it would be nice if this recurring issue was somehow > handled by it. > It's clear, that the problem is in people not updating their email address. Especially when they use employee email and leaving the company, they should change their FAS/bugzilla address to something more permanent. I see the problem in people maintaining packages solely because Red Hat employs them. It decreases Fedora's sustainability as an independent project. -- Tomasz Torcz "God, root, what's the difference?" xmpp: zdzichubg@xxxxxxxxx "God is more forgiving." -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
