----- Original Message ----- > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 11:35:43AM +0200, Johannes Lips wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for two package > > > maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive > > > maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested in > > > maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their email > > > addresses in FAS). If they're not interested in maintaining or we > > > can't locate them I'll have FESCo orphan the packages so that others > > > can take them over. > > > > > Hi all, > > > > wouldn't it make sense to integrate a check into the processes, when people > > leave Redhat, that the packages in fedora are properly orphaned or get a > > new owner? > > Why would even someone's employment status matter? Fedora is a community > project. Yep Fedora is community project and same applies for Red Hatters working on Fedora - they are members of Fedora community and they usually use the same account for their work responsibilities but also for own packages they do in theirs free time. So usually when someone leaves company, the replacement is found and packages are reassigned as Johannes proposed but this does not apply for other packages they work because they want. Jaroslav > -- > Tomasz Torcz "Funeral in the morning, IDE hacking > xmpp: zdzichubg@xxxxxxxxx in the afternoon and evening." - Alan Cox > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
