On 09/02/2014 04:12 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 15:04:14 +0100 > Pádraig Brady <P@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 09/02/2014 01:08 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> there was a new build of libunistring today [1][2] which braought >>> along with it a soname bump from libunistring.so.0 to >>> libunistring.so.2 >>> >>> On a f21 box repoquery tells me that >>> bigloo-0:4.1a-5.2.fc21.armv7hl >>> bigloo-libs-0:4.1a-5.2.fc21.armv7hl >>> freeipa-server-0:4.0.1-1.fc21.armv7hl >>> gettext-0:0.19.2-2.fc21.armv7hl >>> gettext-libs-0:0.19.2-2.fc21.armv7hl >>> gssntlmssp-0:0.5.0-2.fc21.armv7hl >>> guile-5:2.0.11-3.fc21.armv7hl >>> hop-0:2.5.0-1.fc21.2.armv7hl >>> libunistring-devel-0:0.9.3-11.fc21.armv7hl >>> rygel-0:0.23.3.1-1.fc21.armv7hl >>> wcd-0:5.2.5-3.fc21.armv7hl >>> >>> use libunistring.so.0 I have sent a build for gettext as its has >>> broken things, It will need extra care and a buildroot override on >>> f21 to be dealt with. >>> >>> Dennis >>> >>> [1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=574600 >>> [2] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=574599 > >> Oops sorry I missed the soname bump. >> I can revert/untag the F21 build if that helps? > > The f21 build is not in the buildroot, it won't be until the build goes > stable or you make a buildroot override for it. the rest of the > packages in rawhide should be rebuilt. you cant get it in f21 but make > sure you use a buildroot override and submit all packages as a single > update. Ah right, I was thinking it would be harder to break F21 :) I've reverted the F21 update and the above are all rebuilt on rawhide. thanks, Pádraig. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
