On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 17:27:39 -0600 Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Just thought I would drop a quick note to the list about the status of > various things, at least as I know them. ;) > > First, astute readers will note that we were scheduled to go into > freeze for f21 yesterday and that we didn't do so. This was discussed > at the FESCo meeting today and we decided to go into Alpha freeze the > day after we have a viable Test Compose for f21. Going into freeze > before we have that would make it harder to get there, and just > slipping a week for freeze might not be needed. > > The recent mass rebuild for glibc/gcc fixes finished monday. However, > it was discovered that there was a rpm bug present for the last ~1300 > or so builds in the mass rebuild. This bug would cause packages that > override provides/requires to just not add their requires at all. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131892 > I have just finished scraping the logs for those ~1300 f21 builds and > identified the packages affected. I will be rebuilding them in f21 and > rawhide. Happily it isn't too many packages. Packages outside of the > mass rebuild may also be affected, maintainers are advised to > doublecheck their build.log if they override provides/requires and > built anything the last few days. the fix is in rpm-4.12.0-0.beta1.4.fc22 if I see correctly, but what are the broken rpm versions? I would like to skip them on secondary arches. We don't have replicate also all the bugs :-) Dan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
