On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 10:07 -0400, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > That’s the right thing to do of course, but leaves the users with an > unusable system in the mean time. Could the update description at > least generally point to how to work around this if the certificate > owner is not (sufficiently quickly) responsive? I'd expect that users would be blocked from using just one application, or from connecting to just a few servers - but should be able to connect to the majority of the Internet just fine. Can you think of scenarios, where a system is mostly unusable? A general workaround is to downgrade to the previous package version, do you think we need to state that explicitly in the update description? Kai -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
