Re: rebasing protobuf-c (and soname bump)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 04 Aug 2014 18:00:38 +0200
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hello,
>  The protocol buffer-c package was orphaned, and due to a dependency
> I'm now the maintainer. There is a request for 1.0.0 in F21 [0]. That
> is the first stable release since 2011, which bumps the soname, as
> well as requires the .proto files to be recompiled. Is there a reason
> for not rebasing it in F21?

I think it depends how big changes would be required for the packages
that are built against protobuf-c

[dan@eagle ~]$ repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires protobuf-c
collectd-pinba-0:5.4.1-5.fc21.x86_64
collectd-write_riemann-0:5.4.1-5.fc21.x86_64
criu-0:1.2-2.fc21.x86_64
libgadu-0:1.12.0-1.fc22.i686
libgadu-0:1.12.0-1.fc22.x86_64
ocserv-0:0.8.2-1.fc22.x86_64
osm2pgsql-0:0.84.0-2.fc21.x86_64
protobuf-c-devel-0:0.15-9.fc21.i686
protobuf-c-devel-0:0.15-9.fc21.x86_64


		Dan

> regards,
> Nikos
> 
> [0]. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126116
> 
> 
> -- 
> devel mailing list
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux