On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 03:06:00PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > However the previous problem(s -- multiple) was glibc using > non-Rawhide for integration testing, especially just while we were > trying to stablise Fedora for a release: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-October/158440.html > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-October/158662.html We're absolutely not going to rebase master in non-rawhide. Our intention is to get glibc 2.20 release out before Fedora turns beta. > But 2.20 is a stable branch, right? So this shouldn't be a concern > now. Yes, it is in what we call, a slushy freeze right now. Changes going in are mostly regression fixes and other fixes that should not have any generated code impact. There is however one change that the s/390 folks will find painful - s/390 broke ABI in 2.19 without a proper justification and that is now going to be reverted in 2.20 (and in 2.19, but we don't really care about 2.19 right now). Siddhesh
Attachment:
pgp76ackIVdux.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
