> -----Original Message----- > From: devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:devel- > bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Reindl Harald > > Objections/ideas ? > > honestly if you clean that up rename "dhclient" too which should be simple > be Provides/Obsoletes and result in really clean and understandable packges > > i personally hatet the "dhclient" at least once because searched for "dhcp- > client" and in a perfect world even the binary could be "/usr/sbin/dhcp- > client" with a small change in network.service and NM i guess > > dhcp-client > dhcp-server > dhcp-relay > dhcp-common > dhcp-devel > dhcp-libs I too would prefer seeing dhclient renamed, if any renaming is to happen at all. It's always seemed inconsistent from the many examples that have gone with foo-server + foo-client. Whatever you do, please do so between Fedora releases so that those of us who use things like puppet can have a simple condition on the OS release number. -- John Florian -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
