----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kevin Fenzi" <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> > To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2014 7:17:24 PM > Subject: Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola (fas: deji) > > On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 09:01:33 -0600 > Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 22:03:30 +0800 > > Christopher Meng <cickumqt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > My opinion is, you should only comaintain what you want, not take > > > over other's packages. > > > > > > If FESCo member could give consent of adding someone as an admin(not > > > the point of the contact) of a package instead of orphaning lots of > > > packages, that will be helpful. > > > > The plan is to orphan the packages, but leave the old point of contact > > with acls. That way someone active can take over the package, but if > > the old point of contact comes back they can just join right back in. > > > > This way the package gets active folks caring for it and the former > > point of contact can come back anytime. > > Sorry for the long delay here. ;( There was a issue with the pkgdb2 api > to do this, then I was traveling, etc. > > It's now been done. > > The following packages are looking for a new point of contact on at > least one branch: > > (Note that many of them have co-maintainers, so do check with them to > see if any of them would like to become the new point of contact): > > atlas Taken by fkluknav Regards, -- Tomas Hozza Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience PGP: 1D9F3C2D Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
