Hello
2014-07-21 10:59 GMT+02:00 Christopher Meng <cickumqt@xxxxxxxxx>:
2014-07-21 10:59 GMT+02:00 Christopher Meng <cickumqt@xxxxxxxxx>:
I just want to ask here, why did you retire the pywcs and considered
it as dead upstream whereas pypi pywcs has a new release in the
February?
The functionallity of pywcs is now in astropy, is where active development is happening. The API is the same. Sometimes the developers backport the code to pywcs, but is a dead end.
And now APLpy is broken.
I contacted the maintainer before the change and he agreed to update to APLpy 0.9.11 that uses astropy instead of pywcs. He hasn't updated yet.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116895
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116895
In this report there is a new specfile for APLpy 0.9.11. I would have updated myself but I'm not a proven packager.
Regards
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
