Re: New Fedora 22 Change proposal: systemd-sysusers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 10.07.14 08:17, Oron Peled (oron@xxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:

> 
> 
> A non-API related question...
> 
> On Thursday 10 July 2014 01:49:41 Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > Please understand that we are not duplicating "adduser" here. Already in
> > the name of the tool we wanted to make clear thtat this is abotu system
> > users, nothing else. The file format we defined has been reduced to the
> > minimum possible, in order to make it difficult for people to use it for
> > anything else than this.
> 
> There are cases where a home directory of system users carry some semantics.
> 
> Two examples from the top of my head:
>  * Some tftpd implementations use it as the base path (and chroot into it)
>  * Some anonymous ftpd implementation have similar use (chroot into ~ftp)
> 
> So I assume *all* of these cases should be replaced by systemd explicit
> settings -- e.g: WorkingDirectory, RootDirectory in the unit file.
> 
> Generally, I prefer the explicit systemd settings over home directory
> with "magical" effects, but I wonder if anyone is aware of existing
> system users which carry more complex semantics.

The "gdm" user also kinda needs a home directory. I figure we should add
a figth column to sysusers.d fragments, that allows setting the home
directory. It's on the TODO list now.

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux