iperf 2.0.* has a dead upstream, but last I checked 3.0.* (for which there appears to be a distinct rpm package, not maintained by me) isn't offering 100% feature parity. Not talking about 2.X <-> 3.X compatibility, but rather what all the 2.0 flags do vs. what the 3.X ones do :) Anyhow, while I think it might be still worth keeping 2.X around, I am totally swamped at the moment and can't do it justice, so free to a good home. Potential maintainers, please note there are two open bugs against iperf 2.0.5: 1108805 and 1116917, which you'd be inheriting as well. Thanks, --Gabriel -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
