On 07/07/2014 12:03 PM, Thomas Woerner wrote:
> On 07/07/2014 02:55 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> Thomas, the real question here is this: If a package wants to install
>> (and maintain) its own set of firewalld service definitions, is the
>> approach Stef took the best one? If so, we should submit a Packaging
>> Guidelines edit to the FPC and get this codified where others can find
>> it.
>>
> Yes, this is the best approach right now.
Hmm. If I've made a temporary change to my firewall settings, I might
be a bit annoyed if an (apparently unrelated) package installation
caused the configuration to revert to the permanent configuration.
Is there not a more specific command that adds the service definition to
the current environment without a full reload?
--
========================================================================
Ian Pilcher arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx
Sent from the cloud -- where it's already tomorrow
========================================================================
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
