On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 12:35:26AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > >> It's a burden for downstream to ship such a compat- package for chrome >> only, and chrome is not a part of Fedora. > > Maintaining software in general is a burden, but we do it for the > benefit of our users anyway. The best case scenario would certainly be > for Google to update their packages, but if they don't then how does > rendering the package uninstallable benefit our users who want to > install it? I don't think they "don't" if you could give google-chrome-unstable a try. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
