On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:18:15 +0200 drago01 <drago01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:11:53 +0200 > > drago01 <drago01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> That wasn't about "poor" as in slow vs. "great" as in fast but > >> bandwith capped vs. not. > >> > >> If building deltas are slow the solution is not to disable them > >> but to find out why there are slow and fix that. One thing for > >> instance is that it insists on generating the original rpm while > >> creating an uncompressed rpm would save a compress + uncompressed > >> cycle during updates (the former is a bit extensive for xz). > > > > I think It could avoid doing that if people didn't mind that it > > couldn't be gpg checked. > > Well the delta files themselves could be signed no? I do not think that would work, no. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
