On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Jon <jdisnard@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I personally tend to agree with Troy. > > We should consider defaulting to disable delta rpm at most, and at > least comment the configs, or make things intelligent. > > For me, it takes longer to process delta rpm files than to download > the actual full rpm, even on high end systems, or low end. > > I suppose in a way this goes back to the flame fest about the package > updater knowing about network conditions. > > * With great network conditions, downloading full rpm might be optimal > to the deltas. You also put more pressure on the mirrors hosts' bandwidth. Dridi > * With poor network conditions, deltas might be nice, but perhaps not > with low end computer. > > > > -Jon > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
