Re: Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2014-06-27 at 12:48 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> So just to clarify here: the idea behind my proposal is not
> necessarily 
> to aid people who often fix large number of small bugs across
> packages, 
> for such people it is best if they applied for proven packager
> status. 
> What I'm more interested in is improving the situation where a
> "common" 
> user comes across this one very annoying bug, decides he wants to
> help 
> out and fix it, and then ends up seeing his patch rotting away
> because 
> no-one seems to care. Such situations can be frustrating and also 
> discourage from submitting fixes in the future.

Fedora can learn a lot from openSUSE here. In openSUSE the frustrated
user submits a merge request, and it gets looked at rather quickly,
since merge requests are rare while Bugzilla comments are common.
There's absolutely no need for a packager to be willing to give others
access to his package (though in openSUSE, groups of maintainers
maintain groups of packages, which probably works better since there are
more people to respond).

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux