On 06/23/2014 07:35 PM, Mattia Verga wrote:
If yum history showed that a protection for critical packages is useful and appreciated by the majority, why the yum replacement shouldn't implement that protection saying it's unuseful?
I'd go into a different direction: The fact, yum had such a protection, has prevented users from going through the learning curve of having to experience such incidents.
That said, yum's protection mechanims to me is a fuse, like the electrical fuse in your house, which you'll hardly notice and are likely to consider superflous, until you one day realize it already has safed your life multiple times.
Ralf -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
