|
On 06/13/2014 09:03 AM, drago01 wrote:
Yes but who is this better for? A few developers or the mass of people and documentation thatOn Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Am 13.06.2014 14:53, schrieb Jan Zelený:That being said, the reason for not renaming dnf to yum is that renaming this project to yum will do nothing else than to confuse its users, as they will think this is still yum and they should expect from dnf it what they expected from yum. They should not. And dnf is not yum, I'm really sorry if you think it is.the user expects that anyways if you replace something he did not asked for replace it and what just worked for himWell there are different levels of "works" i.e just because something works that something does not have to be the best possible implementation of "something" ... Horses worked too but at some point we decided that cars work better and moved on. are used to using "yum". With cars it was obviously better for me - dnf not so obvious. Regards, Steve --
Stephen Clark NetWolves Managed Services, LLC. Director of Technology Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.clark@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.netwolves.com |
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
