Am 13.06.2014 15:03, schrieb drago01: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Am 13.06.2014 14:53, schrieb Jan Zelený: >>> That being said, the reason for not renaming dnf to yum is that renaming this >>> project to yum will do nothing else than to confuse its users, as they will >>> think this is still yum and they should expect from dnf it what they expected >>> from yum. They should not. And dnf is not yum, I'm really sorry if you think >>> it is. >> >> the user expects that anyways if you replace something he >> did not asked for replace it and what just worked for him > > Well there are different levels of "works" i.e just because something works that > something does not have to be the best possible implementation of > "something" ... close your eyes for 2 seconds to face how that bothers the user which is the bigot justification for the rename do you seriously explain me it's wrong that Linux still is called Linux or even that the implementation of 3.15 has anything common with Linux 1.0? > Horses worked too but at some point we decided that cars work better > and moved on that's childish a horse and a car are completly different things yum and dnf are not
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
